Giants in genomics: Francis Crick

Image credit: Wikimedia

Giants in genomics: Francis Crick

Giants in genomics: Francis Crick

Francis Crick and his American colleague, James Watson, discovered the double helix structure of DNA. For this fundamental finding Francis, James and Maurice Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1962.

Giants in genomics: Francis Crick

Francis Crick was born in Northampton, UK, in 1916. He began his academic career studying physics at University College London, where he graduated in 1937. He was keen to carry on studying towards his PhD straight away, but his plans were put on hold when the Second World War broke out in 1939. Instead, for the next eight years he worked for the British Admiralty developing mines for the Royal Navy.

During this period, Francis came across the book What is Life? by an Austrian quantum physicist Erwin Schrödinger. As a result he decided to change paths from researching physics in London to studying biology in Cambridge, first at the Strangeways Research Laboratory and then later at the Cavendish Laboratory.

Francis Crick was 12 years older than James Watson.

In 1953 the pair published their conclusions about the double helix structure of DNA and how it replicates in Nature magazine.

Despite Francis being 12 years older, when James Watson arrived in Cambridge aged 23, the two scientists struck up a strong and very successful friendship. They shared similar scientific interests and were keen to discover the structure of DNA. Francis, fiercely intelligent, worked well in the company of other scientists against whom he could spark ideas, and James insisted on surrounding himself with intelligent people, so the partnership was ideal. In 1953, after working with numerous models and X-ray images, the pair published their conclusions about the double helix structure of DNA and how it replicates in Nature magazine.

Francis Crick (right) with James Watson (centre) and Maclyn McCarty (left; geneticist who discovered DNA carried genetic information).
Image credit: Marjorie McCarty/PLOS Biology

To this day there has been much discussion about the role Rosalind Franklin had in the work of Francis Crick and James Watson. It is known that Francis and James gained a crucial insight from her work that most likely had great advantages for their own progress. However, Rosalind received very little credit in their accounts of what happened. At the same time as Francis and James were carrying out their research to discover the structure of DNA, Rosalind Franklin was also using X-ray crystallography in the hope of making the same breakthrough. She and her PhD student, Raymond Gosling, produced an X-ray image of DNA that allowed them to draw conclusions about the double helix shape of DNA. Her data went unpublished but was shown to Francis and James, without her knowledge, by Maurice Wilkins. This provided evidence fundamental to Francis and James’ discovery but they barely acknowledged her contribution when it came to publishing the results. Tragically, Rosalind then died before she could get any of the recognition she deserved.

After publishing their breakthrough findings, Francis remained in the UK and continued to study DNA. In collaboration with Sydney Brenner, he focused on the biochemical processes involved in the construction of proteins and the ways that our genes control this.

Despite Francis and James’ huge breakthrough many questions still remained as to how the sequence of four bases could instruct the assembly of proteins.

Despite Francis and James’ huge breakthrough in discovering the structure of DNA, many questions still remained as to how the sequence of four bases of DNA could instruct the assembly of different amino acids to form proteins. The result of Francis’ research on this was the ‘sequence hypothesis’ where he stated that genetic information was held in the sequence of bases in DNA.

And Francis’ discoveries didn’t stop there. In 1958, alongside a new partner, George Gamow, Francis proposed how DNA directs protein synthesis in a cell.

Although a professional physicist, George was relatively new to biology. However, he put forward the first suggestion that explained how the bases in DNA code for amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. Although containing some errors, Francis later stated that George’s ideas were key in inspiring him to consider the problem.

Francis Crick was made a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1959.

The process he came up with as a result was described as the ‘central dogma’ of molecular biology. It outlined how DNA codes for proteins by transferring information from DNA to RNA, which is then ‘read’ in groups of three letters, or triplets, to produce a chain of amino acids that makes up a protein. Francis first explained this in 1958 but it was reaffirmed a number of years later in 1970, when it was published in Nature magazine.

In 1959, Francis Crick was made a Fellow of the Royal Society. He then joined the Salk Institute in California in 1976 where his research changed to focus on the brain and consciousness.

Francis Crick at a dinner at the Nobel Prize Winners Conference in Lindau, Germany in 1981.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

In addition to the Nobel Prize he was awarded in 1962, Francis’ honours included the Lasker Award, the Award of Merit from the Gairdner Foundation, and the Prix Charles Leopold Meyer of the French Academy of Sciences. He was a member of the US National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, the French Academy of Sciences and the Irish Academy.

In 2004, Francis died, aged 88, of colon cancer. A public memorial to celebrate his life and work was held at the Salk Institute with a number of guest speakers, including James Watson and Sydney Brenner.

This page was last updated on 2021-07-21

How helpful was this page?

👎 👍 Send

What's the main reason for your rating?


Which of these best describes your occupation?


how old are students / how old are you?


What is the first part of your school's postcode?


How has the site influenced you (or others)?


Thankyou, we value your feedback!

If you have any other comments or suggestions, please let us know at


Can you spare 5-8 minutes to tell us what you think of this website? Open survey